This curriculum will cover subjective findings which correlate with objective documentation from the Doctor’s offices and diagnostic procedures. I will show the attorneys how to utilize the AMA guidelines for evaluation of ligament laxity. I will demonstrate how to utilize AMA guides for concrete clarity of injury permanency, DRE differentiators, and subtle differences of the 4th, 5th and 6th editions. I will show the significance of ligament laxity in coding (M24.28), objective documentation, AMA guides and permanency/impairment in the injury arena.
Objectives:
Hour 1
1. Demonstrate how to Locate, Define and Quantify subluxations (50 mins)
Hour 2
2. Correlate subjectivity vs. objectivity from the consult, diagnostics and symptomatology (50 mins)
Hour 3
3. Measure ligament laxity (M24.28) and differentiate with the AMA Guidelines (50 mins)
Hour 4
4. Demonstrate x-ray analysis per the AMA guidelines and court room mannerisms (50 mins)
Hour 5
5. Define medical necessity and document in SOAP notes (50 mins)
Hour 6
6. Proving documentation for insurance companies to verify necessity to go to the next academic step (50 mins)
Outline:
I will demonstrate how to utilize the:
Defining subluxation
to the highest level
References:
1. AMA Guides (4th, 5th and 6th editions)
2. Yochum/Rowe radiology
3. White and Panjabi
4. List of research articles I use in courtroom presentations
5. Published article (Subjective vs. Objective Findings) (June 15, 2013 – Dynamic Chiropractic)